1 Bitcoin Price to USD - Chart & Calculator

Bitcoin Premium

Buy and sell Rare & Collectable Bitcoin for a Premium!
[link]

LitecoinMarkets

This is a subreddit devoted to long-term and short-term trading of Litecoins.
[link]

Litecoin

For discussion about Litecoin, the leading cryptocurrency derived from Bitcoin. Litecoin is developed with a focus on speed, efficiency, and wider initial coin distribution through the use of scrypt-based mining.
[link]

Bitcoin will be swept to $1 million in five years by an enormous wall of money, former Goldman ... (current BTC/USD price is $11,341.68)

Latest Bitcoin News:
Bitcoin will be swept to $1 million in five years by an enormous wall of money, former Goldman ...
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Bitcoin Mining | Blockchain
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

Enormous Wall of Money Coming Into Bitcoin, Price to Reach $1 Million in 5 Years, Says Raoul Pal (current BTC/USD price is $11,419.24)

Latest Bitcoin News:
Enormous Wall of Money Coming Into Bitcoin, Price to Reach $1 Million in 5 Years, Says Raoul Pal
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Bitcoin Mining | Blockchain
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

Cost to mine 1 Bitcoin is now $14,000 USD. "Bitcoin Price Chart Fractal Seen in 2019 Hints at $14K Within Months". I bet BTC price ascends to $14,000 in next 30 days! NewYorkCoin (NYC) is a faster, no fee version of Litecoin since 2014! Official New York Coin nycoin.net | newyorkcoin.net

Cost to mine 1 Bitcoin is now $14,000 USD. submitted by hivewalletvictim to NewYorkCoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin price NOW is likely the lowest it will ever be in our lifetime. Cost to BUY 1 BTC is now LESS THAN cost to mine 1 BTC. Approx $7,000 USD. In 2 short months, the cost to mine 1 Bitcoin will DOUBLE. ❤️ BUY BTC TODAY ❤️ New York Coin (NYC) is a faster, free version of Bitcoin and Litecoin.

Bitcoin price NOW is likely the lowest it will ever be in our lifetime. Cost to BUY 1 BTC is now LESS THAN cost to mine 1 BTC. Approx $7,000 USD. In 2 short months, the cost to mine 1 Bitcoin will DOUBLE. ❤️ BUY BTC TODAY ❤️ New York Coin (NYC) is a faster, free version of Bitcoin and Litecoin. submitted by hivewalletvictim to NewYorkCoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin in Zimbabwe – Part 1 of a New Documentary Podcast Series (current BTC/USD price is $5,949.87)

Latest Bitcoin News:
Bitcoin in Zimbabwe – Part 1 of a New Documentary Podcast Series
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Bitcoin Mining | Blockchain
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools. Follow us on Twitter @CoinSalad.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

How Much Bitcoin You Need to Be in the Richest 1% of BTC Holders (current BTC/USD price is $10,125.11)

Latest Bitcoin News:
How Much Bitcoin You Need to Be in the Richest 1% of BTC Holders
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Bitcoin Mining | Blockchain
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools. Follow us on Twitter @CoinSalad.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

French entrepreneur steals €1.1 million worth of bitcoin from former firm in revenge for being sacked (current BTC/USD price is $7,483.09)

Latest Bitcoin News:
French entrepreneur steals €1.1 million worth of bitcoin from former firm in revenge for being sacked
Other Related Bitcoin Topics:
Bitcoin Price | Bitcoin Mining | Blockchain
The latest Bitcoin news has been sourced from the CoinSalad.com Bitcoin Price and News Events page. CoinSalad is a web service that provides real-time Bitcoin market info, charts, data and tools. Follow us on Twitter @CoinSalad.
submitted by coinsaladcom to CoinSalad [link] [comments]

1 BTC = 64 000 USD would be > $1 trillion market cap - versus $7 trillion market cap for gold, and $82 trillion of "money" in the world. Could "pure" Bitcoin get there without SegWit, Lightning, or Bitcoin Unlimited? Metcalfe's Law suggests that 8MB blocks could support a price of 1 BTC = 64 000 USD

Graph - Visualizing Metcalfe's Law: The relationship between Bitcoin's market cap and the square of the number of transactions
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/574l2q/graph_visualizing_metcalfes_law_the_relationship/
Bitcoin has its own E = mc2 law: Market capitalization is proportional to the square of the number of transactions. But, since the number of transactions is proportional to the (actual) blocksize, then Blockstream's artificial blocksize limit is creating an artificial market capitalization limit!
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4dfb3bitcoin_has_its_own_e_mc2_law_market/
Bitcoin's market price is trying to rally, but it is currently constrained by Core/Blockstream's artificial blocksize limit. Chinese miners can only win big by following the market - not by following Core/Blockstream. The market will always win - either with or without the Chinese miners.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4ipb4q/bitcoins_market_price_is_trying_to_rally_but_it/
Getting the maximum "bang" from minimal changes
Maybe we don't need to "change" Bitcoin very much at all in order to reach $1 trillion market capitalization.
  • Some people are worried that SegWit would over-complicate the code, and Lightning will create centralized, censorable hubs
  • Other people are worried that Bitcoin Unlimited would give too much control to miners.
Maybe both groups of people could agree on a "minimal change" approach.
What if we simply change the "max blocksize" from 1 MB to 8 MB - and leave everything else unchanged?
Then...
  • Nobody would have to worry about "unknown game theory" involving Bitcoin Unlimited
  • And nobody would have to worry about "technical debt" involving SegWit, or "centralized hubs" with Lightning.
It be great if we could get to $1 trillion market cap the simple and safe way - just by following Satoshi's vision.
You Do The Math - u/ydtm !
Just for the fun of it, we can estimate some rough projections for the next four years - up until the time of the next "halving":
  • 1.68 * 1.68 * 1.68 * 1.68 = 8, so let's say that blocksize goes up 1.68x (ie 68%) per year, or 8x over four years.
  • 2.83 * 2.83 * 2.83 * 2.83 = 64, so let's say that price goes up 2.83x (ie 183%) per year, or 64x over four years.
These certainly aren't "outrageous" estimates - in fact, they're fairly conservative and realistic - especially given the ongoing problems in the "legacy" system of "fiat" currencies (devaluation, war on cash, hyperinflation, bank bail-ins, gold confiscation, etc.)
So, with minimal alterations (simply changing a "1" to an "8" in the code, and making any other associated changes), after 4 years of this kind of realistic projected growth, Bitcoin could be in a very, very good place.
By 2020-2021, Bitcoin price could be on the moon - and Bitcoin "full nodes" could be decentralized all over the face of the Earth
  • Bitcoin price over 60 000 USD
  • Bitcoin market cap over $1 trillion USD
  • Bitcoin blocksize around 8 MB - which the vast majority of users would easily be able to download every 10 minutes (even behind Tor)
This might be the simplest and safest path to success for Bitcoin right now.
Money Bandwidth makes the world go around
Installing broadband is not "rocket science". It's just laying some "dumb" cables.
The farmer who built her own broadband
https://np.reddit.com/technology/comments/5khs33/the_farmer_who_built_her_own_broadband/
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37974267
If Bitcoin-over-broadband turns out to be the "gateway" to financial freedom (allowing people to run their own full / validating / non-mining Bitcoin nodes)...
...then Bitcoin itself could end up being the "great motivator" that unleashes a mad race where communities all around the world lay cables in the ground - due to pressure from people who need Bitcoin in order to ensure their financial freedom for themselves and their families.
"What if every bank and accounting firm needed to start running a Bitcoin node?" – bdarmstrong (Brian Armstrong, founder & CEO of Coinbase)
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/3zaony/what_if_every_bank_and_accounting_firm_needed_to/
Note: The estimate of $82 trillion of "money" in the world came from a recent article in the Financial Times of London, quoting a study done by the CIA in 2014.
TL;DR: I am one of the biggest pessimists about most things in the world. But I'm a big optimist about Satoshi's Bitcoin - and about its ability to the moon while staying decentralized - with almost no changes to the existing code.
UPDATE:
WARNING: A certain well-known person, who always gets massively downvoted on this more-free sub, is commenting below (and getting massively downvoted as usual), trying to deploy the "scare tactic" of "OMG DATACENTERS!!!1!" - which is actually a straw man (ie, it's a non-issue).
Please remember that the OP is based specifically on a 8 MB blocksize - which would not need the dreaded DATACENTERS!!!1!" - because a sufficient number of people in the world can already download 8 MB in 10 minutes (even behind Tor) on their home Internet connections.
So beware of trolls / disruptors who trot out this straw man / scare tactic of "DATACENTERS!!!1!".
This is tired piece of propaganda on their part - which has been debunked repeatedly - but they still keep trying to scare people with this non-issue.
The whole idea of this OP is to argue that we can potentially get to around 50 000 - 60 000 USD per coin, and $1 trillion market cap - merely by allowing the blocksize to grow from 1 MB to 8 MB - and not changing anything else in the code - no SegWit (although solving transaction malleability and quadratic time could certainly be added at some point), no Lightning - no Bitcoin Unlimited - and... no datacenters.
Satoshi's Bitcoin is a really massive success after just 8 years - and the ballpark figures in this OP suggest that it can be a really, really, really, really massive success in something like 4 more years - by making only a tiny, Satoshi-approved change to the code (changing the "max blocksize" from 1 MB to 8 MB), and doing no "weird stuff" - no SegWit-as-a-spaghetti-code-Soft-Fork, no Lightning-centralized-hubs, and no Dreaded Datacenters!
Don't mess with success!
And don't listen to trolls lying and saying that 8 MB blocks would need DATACENTERS!!!1!
Remember: If you can download 8 MB in 10 minutes at home - preferably behind Tor - then you can run a full node - potentially supporting numbers in the ballpark of USD 50 000 - 60 000 per coin, $1 trillion market cap - with lots of other users like you running nodes around the world - and no major changes to today's code (just changing 1 MB to 8 MB) - and no DATACENTERS!!!1!
submitted by ydtm to btc [link] [comments]

AXA/Blockstream are suppressing Bitcoin price at 1000 bits = 1 USD. If 1 bit = 1 USD, then Bitcoin's market cap would be 15 trillion USD - close to the 82 trillion USD of "money" in the world. With Bitcoin Unlimited, we can get to 1 bit = 1 USD on-chain with 32MB blocksize ("Million-Dollar Bitcoin")

TL;DR:
~ YouDoTheMath u/ydtm
Details:
(1) Who is AXA? Why and how would they want to suppress the Bitcoin price?
Blockstream is now controlled by the Bilderberg Group - seriously! AXA Strategic Ventures, co-lead investor for Blockstream's $55 million financing round, is the investment arm of French insurance giant AXA Group - whose CEO Henri de Castries has been chairman of the Bilderberg Group since 2012.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/47zfzt/blockstream_is_now_controlled_by_the_bilderberg/
If Bitcoin becomes a major currency, then tens of trillions of dollars on the "legacy ledger of fantasy fiat" will evaporate, destroying AXA, whose CEO is head of the Bilderbergers. This is the real reason why AXA bought Blockstream: to artificially suppress Bitcoin volume and price with 1MB blocks.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4r2pw5/if_bitcoin_becomes_a_major_currency_then_tens_of/
The insurance company with the biggest exposure to the 1.2 quadrillion dollar (ie, 1200 TRILLION dollar) derivatives casino is AXA. Yeah, that AXA, the company whose CEO is head of the Bilderberg Group, and whose "venture capital" arm bought out Bitcoin development by "investing" in Blockstream.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4k1r7v/the_insurance_company_with_the_biggest_exposure/
Greg Maxwell used to have intelligent, nuanced opinions about "max blocksize", until he started getting paid by AXA, whose CEO is head of the Bilderberg Group - the legacy financial elite which Bitcoin aims to disintermediate. Greg always refuses to address this massive conflict of interest. Why?
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4mlo0z/greg_maxwell_used_to_have_intelligent_nuanced/
Who owns the world? (1) Barclays, (2) AXA, (3) State Street Bank. (Infographic in German - but you can understand it without knowing much German: "Wem gehört die Welt?" = "Who owns the world?") AXA is the #2 company with the most economic poweconnections in the world. And AXA owns Blockstream.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5btu02/who_owns_the_world_1_barclays_2_axa_3_state/
(2) What evidence do we have that Core and AXA-owned Blockstream are actually impacting (suppressing) the Bitcoin price?
This trader's price & volume graph / model predicted that we should be over $10,000 USD/BTC by now. The model broke in late 2014 - when AXA-funded Blockstream was founded, and started spreading propaganda and crippleware, centrally imposing artificially tiny blocksize to suppress the volume & price.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5obe2m/this_traders_price_volume_graph_model_predicted/
This graph shows Bitcoin price and volume (ie, blocksize of transactions on the blockchain) rising hand-in-hand in 2011-2014. In 2015, Core/Blockstream tried to artificially freeze the blocksize - and artificially froze the price. Bitcoin Classic will allow volume - and price - to freely rise again.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/44xrw4/this_graph_shows_bitcoin_price_and_volume_ie/
Also see a similar graph in u/Peter__R's recent article on Medium - where the graph clearly shows the same Bitcoin price suppression - ie price uncoupling from adoption and dipping below the previous tightly correlated trend - starting right at that fateful moment when Blockstream came on the scene and told Bitcoiners that we can't have nice things anymore like on-chain scaling and increasing adoption and price: late 2014.
Graph - Visualizing Metcalfe's Law: The relationship between Bitcoin's market cap and the square of the number of transactions
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/574l2q/graph_visualizing_metcalfes_law_the_relationship/
Bitcoin has its own E = mc2 law: Market capitalization is proportional to the square of the number of transactions. But, since the number of transactions is proportional to the (actual) blocksize, then Blockstream's artificial blocksize limit is creating an artificial market capitalization limit!
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4dfb3bitcoin_has_its_own_e_mc2_law_market/
1 BTC = 64 000 USD would be > $1 trillion market cap - versus $7 trillion market cap for gold, and $82 trillion of "money" in the world. Could "pure" Bitcoin get there without SegWit, Lightning, or Bitcoin Unlimited? Metcalfe's Law suggests that 8MB blocks could support a price of 1 BTC = 64 000 USD
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5lzez2/1_btc_64_000_usd_would_be_1_trillion_market_cap/
(3) "But no - they'd never do that!"
Actually - yes, they would. And "they" already are. For years, governments and central bankers have been spending trillions in fiat on wars - and eg suppressing precious metals prices by flooding the market with "fake (paper) gold" and "fake (paper) silver" - to prevent the debt- & war-backed PetroDollar from collapsing.
The owners of Blockstream are spending $76 million to do a "controlled demolition" of Bitcoin by manipulating the Core devs & the Chinese miners. This is cheap compared to the $ trillions spent on the wars on Iraq & Libya - who also defied the Fed / PetroDollar / BIS private central banking cartel.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5q6kjo/the_owners_of_blockstream_are_spending_76_million/
JPMorgan suppresses gold & silver prices to prop up the USDollar - via "naked short selling" of GLD & SLV ETFs. Now AXA (which owns $94 million of JPMorgan stock) may be trying to suppress Bitcoin price - via tiny blocks. But AXA will fail - because the market will always "maximize coinholder value"
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4vjne5/jpmorgan_suppresses_gold_silver_prices_to_prop_up/
Why did Blockstream CTO u/nullc Greg Maxwell risk being exposed as a fraud, by lying about basic math? He tried to convince people that Bitcoin does not obey Metcalfe's Law (claiming that Bitcoin price & volume are not correlated, when they obviously are). Why is this lie so precious to him?
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/57dsgz/why_did_blockstream_cto_unullc_greg_maxwell_risk/
If you had $75 million invested in Blockstream, and you saw that stubbornly freezing the blocksize at 1 MB for the next year was clogging up the network and could kill the currency before LN even had a chance to roll out, wouldn't you support an immediate increase to 2 MB to protect your investment?
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/48xm28/if_you_had_75_million_invested_in_blockstream_and/
[Tinfoil] What do these seven countries have in common? (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran) In the context of banking, one that sticks out is that none of them is listed among the 56 member banks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
https://np.reddit.com/bitcoin_uncensored/comments/3yits0/tinfoil_what_do_these_seven_countries_have_in/
(4) What can we do to fight back and let Bitcoin's price continue to rise again?
  • Reject the Central Blocksize Planners at Core/Blockstream - and the censors at r\bitcoin.
  • Install Bitcoin Unlimited, which supports market-based blocksize in accordance with Satoshi's original vision.
  • Be patient - and persistent - and decentralized - and Bitcoin will inevitably win.
The moderators of r\bitcoin have now removed a post which was just quotes by Satoshi Nakamoto.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/49l4uh/the_moderators_of_rbitcoin_have_now_removed_a/
"Notice how anyone who has even remotely supported on-chain scaling has been censored, hounded, DDoS'd, attacked, slandered & removed from any area of Core influence. Community, business, Hearn, Gavin, Jeff, XT, Classic, Coinbase, Unlimited, ViaBTC, Ver, Jihan, Bitcoin.com, btc" ~ u/randy-lawnmole
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5omufj/notice_how_anyone_who_has_even_remotely_supported/
"I was initially in the small block camp. My worry was decentralization & node count going down as a result. But when Core refused to increase the limit to 4MB, which at the time no Core developer thought would have a negative effect, except Luke-Jr, I began to see ulterior motives." u/majorpaynei86
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5748kb/i_was_initially_in_the_small_block_camp_my_worry/
Satoshi Nakamoto, October 04, 2010, 07:48:40 PM "It can be phased in, like: if (blocknumber > 115000) maxblocksize = largerlimit / It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete."
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/3wo9pb/satoshi_nakamoto_october_04_2010_074840_pm_it_can/
The debate is not "SHOULD THE BLOCKSIZE BE 1MB VERSUS 1.7MB?". The debate is: "WHO SHOULD DECIDE THE BLOCKSIZE?" (1) Should an obsolete temporary anti-spam hack freeze blocks at 1MB? (2) Should a centralized dev team soft-fork the blocksize to 1.7MB? (3) OR SHOULD THE MARKET DECIDE THE BLOCKSIZE?
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5pcpec/the_debate_is_not_should_the_blocksize_be_1mb/
"Bitcoin Unlimited ... makes it more convenient for miners and nodes to adjust the blocksize cap settings through a GUI menu, so users don't have to mod the Core code themselves (like some do now). There would be no reliance on Core (or XT) to determine 'from on high' what the options are." - ZB
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/3zki3h/bitcoin_unlimited_makes_it_more_convenient_fo
Bitcoin Unlimited is the real Bitcoin, in line with Satoshi's vision. Meanwhile, BlockstreamCoin+RBF+SegWitAsASoftFork+LightningCentralizedHub-OfflineIOUCoin is some kind of weird unrecognizable double-spendable non-consensus-driven fiat-financed offline centralized settlement-only non-P2P "altcoin"
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/57brcb/bitcoin_unlimited_is_the_real_bitcoin_in_line/
The Nine Miners of China: "Core is a red herring. Miners have alternative code they can run today that will solve the problem. Choosing not to run it is their fault, and could leave them with warehouses full of expensive heating units and income paid in worthless coins." – tsontar
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/3xhejm/the_nine_miners_of_china_core_is_a_red_herring/?st=iz7029hc&sh=c6063b52
ViABTC: "Why I support BU: We should give the question of block size to the free market to decide. It will naturally adjust to ever-improving network & technological constraints. Bitcoin Unlimited guarantees that block size will follow what the Bitcoin network is capable of handling safely."
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/574g5l/viabtc_why_i_support_bu_we_should_give_the/
Fun facts about ViaBTC: Founded by expert in distributed, highly concurrent networking from "China's Google". Inspired by Viaweb (first online store, from LISP guru / YCombinator founder Paul Graham). Uses a customized Bitcoin client on high-speed network of clusters in US, Japan, Europe, Hong Kong.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/57e0t8/fun_facts_about_viabtc_founded_by_expert_in/
Bitcoin's specification (eg: Excess Blocksize (EB) & Acceptance Depth (AD), configurable via Bitcoin Unlimited) can, should & always WILL be decided by ALL the miners & users - not by a single FIAT-FUNDED, CENSORSHIP-SUPPORTED dev team (Core/Blockstream) & miner (BitFury) pushing SegWit 1.7MB blocks
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5u1r2d/bitcoins_specification_eg_excess_blocksize_eb/
The number of blocks being mined by Bitcoin Unlimited is now getting very close to surpassing the number of blocks being mined by SegWit! More and more people are supporting BU's MARKET-BASED BLOCKSIZE - because BU avoids needless transaction delays and ultimately increases Bitcoin adoption & price!
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5rdhzh/the_number_of_blocks_being_mined_by_bitcoin/
I think the Berlin Wall Principle will end up applying to Blockstream as well: (1) The Berlin Wall took longer than everyone expected to come tumbling down. (2) When it did finally come tumbling down, it happened faster than anyone expected (ie, in a matter of days) - and everyone was shocked.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4kxtq4/i_think_the_berlin_wall_principle_will_end_up/
submitted by ydtm to btc [link] [comments]

Neutro Yellow Paper

Neutro Yellow Paper — “Reaching a Consensus Regarding Blockchain-exogenous values” chapter This chapter of the Yellow Paper is pretty easy, I believe, to understand, so we won’t dive into the ideas presented there. If I were to give a very short-version presentation of the concept, I would ask and answer two questions about it: I. How does it work? The voters can include a limited amount of data, any data, in their votes. In each main-chain block a Schelling Point scheme is performed. Votes that voted too far from the outcome of that Schelling Point scheme are prevented from voting for some time. That time depends on how far were they from that outcome (median of values voted for a given data point). Smart contracts, in turn, can include in their logic simple IF… THEN rule, where the condition to be met is meeting some threshold of votes in some period of time (range of blocks) that voted for some value and, depending on the outcome of that Schelling Point scheme, a certain logic of the smart contract is executed. Let’s say: if >x votes voted for some value during a period from block Y to block Z and the outcome of that is >1, then all the Neutro tokens allocated in the smart contract would be sent to address A; if it’s <1, they would be sent to address B. Smart contracts publish information about how much they are willing to pay for a certain data (e.g. for one vote, voting for a specific value) and they’ll need to pay once that data is provided by a voter in a proper way; voters, in turn, can include in their votes information on how much they want for the data they include. Once conditions from both sides are met, everything works. II. Why it works? For two reasons. Firstly, the smart contract can put an arbitrarily big requirement for the amount of votes that must vote for a specific value in order for the smart contract’s programmed logic to be executed — the bigger this amount, the more of the consensus-reaching network is engaged in the process and the more difficult it is to corrupt that subset of network participants. Secondly, the engaged values’ validators are unknown beforehand, before the actual validation of value takes place using the Schelling Point scheme. So, logically, if you engage 80% of the network to validate some value, you would need to corrupt (ok, that’s a big simplification, but we won’t do math for that) about half of that; you would need to corrupt 40% of the network (voters in our case). And those voters are unknown, anonymous. They are also invested in the network in long-term, because of the nature of validation tokens as a share in future expansion of the main Neutro token supply (described in detail in the Yellow Paper). How are you going to corrupt them? Ok, fine. But why do we need the censorship-resistant, corruption-resistant and decentralized way of reaching consensus on external values, like the weather in California on 1st May 2021 or price of 1 Bitcoin in USD on 20th March 2024? Why would the smart contract need it, if we have oracles? Well, oracles are centralized. If you have a decentralized Daap that uses a centralized Oracle for its functioning, then you’re no better than a centralized service provider. You are no more decentralized, no more censorship-resistant, no more manipulation-resistant than Facebook for example. Not even a bit. And for most applications it’s fine, but blockchain was created to be trustless; trust necessitates power and blockchain is, was and will always be about taking trust along with power from the equation.
So if you want to create a decentralized exchange, insurance company or plain betting platform on the blockchain and create it in such a way that it is trustless — you’ll need this. Blockchains that allow for Daaps are like a “world computer” (that’s a great comparison made by Ethereum for the first time, I believe — correct me if I’m wrong). But how great is your computer without an access to the Internet? It’s fine for some things, maybe writing some documents or something. But you would agree that it’s no more that maybe 5% of the device’s potential once it’s connected to the Internet, wouldn’t you? So it is with blockchain. We want a trustless way of data-feeding with external data, we want to make a “world computer that’s connected”. So that’s the difference.
Neutro WRITTEN BY
submitted by princessjaycc to Neutro [link] [comments]

The three biggest Bitcoin wallets contain over 99974 Bitcoins, even at today’s low Bitcoin price of $6772 the three wallets are worth between $677 billion and $1.26 billion USD each. In comparison, the world’s richest individual, Jeff Bezos, is currently valued at $112 billion USD.

The three biggest Bitcoin wallets contain over 99974 Bitcoins, even at today’s low Bitcoin price of $6772 the three wallets are worth between $677 billion and $1.26 billion USD each. In comparison, the world’s richest individual, Jeff Bezos, is currently valued at $112 billion USD. submitted by cindex_platform to u/cindex_platform [link] [comments]

The absolute maximum USD price of Bitcoin is 1 10^200 USD per Bitcoin after which we will need to fork Reddit to increase the 300 character limit to be able to put the full price in the title box. We need to start the consensus process to fork Reddit ASAP if we want to be ready on time!!!!! /r/btc

The absolute maximum USD price of Bitcoin is 1 10^200 USD per Bitcoin after which we will need to fork Reddit to increase the 300 character limit to be able to put the full price in the title box. We need to start the consensus process to fork Reddit ASAP if we want to be ready on time!!!!! /btc submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Historically, Bitcoin price has been roughly proportional to the *square* of Bitcoin volume (blocksize) - due to the "network effect" or "Metcalfe's Law". This table suggests we could get to 1 BTC = 1 million USD in just 8 years - with no code changes, and moderate blocksize growth and price growth.

Here's how the actual numbers would look each year - starting from a "baseline" of 1000 USD price and 1 MB blocksize in 2017:
Year Blocksize (up 1.54x per year) Price (up 1.542 = 2.37x per year)
2017 1.000 MB 1,000 USD
2018 1.542 MB 2,371 USD
2019 2.378 MB 5,623 USD
2020 3.668 MB 13,335 USD
2021 5.657 MB 31,623 USD
2022 8.724 MB 74,989 USD
2023 13.454 MB 177,828 USD
2024 20.749 MB 421,697 USD
2025 32.000 MB 1,000,000 USD
Where do the "magic numbers" 1.54 and 2.37 come from?
We want to see whether the following growth rates seem realistic / feasible:
So, we take the "8th root" of 32 (to get the annual blocksize increase) and the "8th root" of 1000 (to get the annual price increase):
Also, as we know, 32 * 32 = 1024.
So 32 is roughly the square root of 1000 - ie price increasing 1000x in 8 years is roughly proportional to the square of blocksize increasing 32x in 8 years.
This is of course just a rough projection!
"Past performance does not guarantee future results."
However, this kind of rough projection can be useful to provide a concrete illustration of how a safe and simple on-chain scaling roadmap could easily get us to 1 BTC = 1 million USD within the next two 4-year "halvings" - based on actual historical growth trends, and without any controversial code changes.
Below are some previous posts showing that Bitcoin price has been roughly proportional to the square of Bitcoin volume (blocksize) - and showing that Bitcoin should be able to support gradual blocksize growth:
Bitcoin has its own E = mc2 law: Market capitalization is proportional to the square of the number of transactions. But, since the number of transactions is proportional to the (actual) blocksize, then Blockstream's artificial blocksize limit is creating an artificial market capitalization limit!
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4dfb3bitcoin_has_its_own_e_mc2_law_market/
This trader's price & volume graph / model predicted that we should be over $10,000 USD/BTC by now. The model broke in late 2014 - when AXA-funded Blockstream was founded, and started spreading propaganda and crippleware, centrally imposing artificially tiny blocksize to suppress the volume & price.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5obe2m/this_traders_price_volume_graph_model_predicted/
Bitcoin Original: Reinstate Satoshi's original 32MB max blocksize. If actual blocks grow 54% per year (and price grows 1.542 = 2.37x per year - Metcalfe's Law), then in 8 years we'd have 32MB blocks, 100 txns/sec, 1 BTC = 1 million USD - 100% on-chain P2P cash, without SegWit/Lightning or Unlimited
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5uljaf/bitcoin_original_reinstate_satoshis_original_32mb/
New Cornell Study Recommends a 4MB Blocksize for Bitcoin
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/4cq8v0/new_cornell_study_recommends_a_4mb_blocksize_fo
Updated link to the PDF: http://www.tik.ee.ethz.ch/file/74bc987e6ab4a8478c04950616612f69/main.pdf
That post was from over a year ago - March 2016. Since that time, global internet infrastructure has improved, and we could probably already support 8 MB blocksizes.
Core/Blockstream is living in a fantasy world. In the real world everyone knows (1) our hardware can support 4-8 MB (even with the Great Firewall), and (2) hard forks are cleaner than soft forks. Core/Blockstream refuses to offer either of these things. Other implementations (eg: BU) can offer both.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5ejmin/coreblockstream_is_living_in_a_fantasy_world_in/
Gavin Andresen: "Let's eliminate the limit. Nothing bad will happen if we do, and if I'm wrong the bad things would be mild annoyances, not existential risks, much less risky than operating a network near 100% capacity." (June 2016)
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/6delid/gavin_andresen_lets_eliminate_the_limit_nothing/
21 months ago, Gavin Andresen published "A Scalability Roadmap", including sections called: "Increasing transaction volume", "Bigger Block Road Map", and "The Future Looks Bright". This was the Bitcoin we signed up for. It's time for us to take Bitcoin back from the strangle-hold of Blockstream.
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/43lxgn/21_months_ago_gavin_andresen_published_a/
TL;DR: Bitcoin can easily go to the moon using simple & safe on-chain scaling.
submitted by ydtm to btc [link] [comments]

The price of 1 DOGECOIN in USD == % chance of being murdered in the US /r/Bitcoin

The price of 1 DOGECOIN in USD == % chance of being murdered in the US /Bitcoin submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

05-26 19:22 - 'The price of 1 DOGECOIN in USD == % chance of being murdered in the US' (self.Bitcoin) by /u/gwerks69 removed from /r/Bitcoin within 24-34min

'''
/shitpoast
'''
The price of 1 DOGECOIN in USD == % chance of being murdered in the US
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: gwerks69
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

Home for sale in Bitcoin Located in the Los Angeles suburb of Encino, 3bd, 2bath. Message for more info. I am the owner and a crypto enthusiast. Price is the equivalent of $1.65 M in USD based on Coinbase spot price. Thanks

Home for sale in Bitcoin Located in the Los Angeles suburb of Encino, 3bd, 2bath. Message for more info. I am the owner and a crypto enthusiast. Price is the equivalent of $1.65 M in USD based on Coinbase spot price. Thanks submitted by ImagesOfNetwork to ImagesOfCalifornia [link] [comments]

Home for sale in Bitcoin Located in the Los Angeles suburb of Encino, 3bd, 2bath. Message for more info. I am the owner and a crypto enthusiast. Price is the equivalent of $1.65 M in USD based on Coinbase spot price. Thanks

submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Home for sale in Bitcoin Located in the Los Angeles suburb of Encino, 3bd, 2bath. Message for more info. I am the owner and a crypto enthusiast. Price is the equivalent of $1.65 M in USD based on Coinbase spot price. Thanks

submitted by ImagesOfNetwork to ImagesOfCalifornia [link] [comments]

Facts About Cryptocurrency Wallet And Exchange That Will Blow Your Mind

As we all know the denomination of a bitcoin is getting keener day by day. A bitcoin can be explained as a form of electrical cash. This centralized currency is being used on a wage scale. In addition to this, the thing that matters is, the price of a bitcoin gets higher and low almost every day. Malaysia is one of the most worthy countries which uses Bitcoin and other virtual currencies in a very promising way. Moreover, the price of a bitcoin also differs at each currency state. So, today we are going to collaborate on the sensational price of a bitcoin in ringgit and USD.
Bitcoin price today in ringgit.
A ringgit is a currency that presents the Malaysian standard. Or we can say that it's a Malaysian dollar. Ringgit is used in the national bank of Malaysia on a wage scale. As I mentioned that the price of a bitcoin differs in each currency flow. Similarly, the price of a bitcoin in ringgit also changes probably each day. So are you interested in converting 1 bitcoin into the Malaysian currency (ringgit) In addition to this crypto-currency exchange plays a great role in the denominational price a bitcoin? A bitcoin is the most essential cash flow, the main motto of a bitcoin is to perform financial transactions very anonymously. Because of this importance, the rational price of a bitcoin differs daily if we come towards the price of a bitcoin in ringgit today, so it is:
1 bitcoin = 15,884.19 Malaysian ringgits. If we have a look at the month of December so the price of bitcoin was having 19.844% changes in it which effectively has a great effect on the cash flow market.
Bitcoin price in USD
If we come over the importance of a bitcoin in America. So, like another well-trading countries bitcoin has great importance in America as well. Same as ringgit the cash price of bitcoin also differs every day even in USD.
America is one of the greatest trading countries and its virtual trading sensation is working in a great firm. America is just like a helping hand for the trading sectors. So virtual currencies play a great role in this field. In addition to this, a bitcoin has a special value in the American trading sector. If we come over the today price of a bitcoin in USD so it is mentioned below: -
1 Bitcoin = 3870.75 USD.
Despite this, if we come over the market cap of a bitcoin is it is about67,555,094,056 USD. In USD bitcoin is having this market cap often. In addition to this, the bitcoin is having a great supply overall America people there understand the ripple categories of cash follow and they order a number of bitcoins. Collectively the maximum supply of a bitcoin overall America is about 17,452,712 bitcoins and it's undoubtedly a big deal.
submitted by B4U_Wallet_Exchange to reddCoin [link] [comments]

How to get the 'average weighted average' for a given month?

I want to compare the price of 1 bitcoin in USD to the American Consumer Price Index. Is there a place where I can find the 'average weighted average' for a given month?
submitted by r4wrz to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Putting $400M of Bitcoin on your company balance sheet

Also posted on my blog as usual. Read it there if you can, there are footnotes and inlined plots.
A couple of months ago, MicroStrategy (MSTR) had a spare $400M of cash which it decided to shift to Bitcoin (BTC).
Today we'll discuss in excrutiating detail why this is not a good idea.
When a company has a pile of spare money it doesn't know what to do with, it'll normally do buybacks or start paying dividends. That gives the money back to the shareholders, and from an economic perspective the money can get better invested in other more promising companies. If you have a huge pile of of cash, you probably should be doing other things than leave it in a bank account to gather dust.
However, this statement from MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor exists to make it clear he's buying into BTC for all the wrong reasons:
“This is not a speculation, nor is it a hedge. This was a deliberate corporate strategy to adopt a bitcoin standard.”
Let's unpack it and jump into the economics Bitcoin:

Is Bitcoin money?

No.
Or rather BTC doesn't act as money and there's no serious future path for BTC to become a form of money. Let's go back to basics. There are 3 main economic problems money solves:
1. Medium of Exchange. Before money we had to barter, which led to the double coincidence of wants problem. When everyone accepts the same money you can buy something from someone even if they don't like the stuff you own.
As a medium of exchange, BTC is not good. There are significant transaction fees and transaction waiting times built-in to BTC and these worsen the more popular BTC get.
You can test BTC's usefulness as a medium of exchange for yourself right now: try to order a pizza or to buy a random item with BTC. How many additional hurdles do you have to go through? How many fewer options do you have than if you used a regular currency? How much overhead (time, fees) is there?
2. Unit of Account. A unit of account is what you compare the value of objects against. We denominate BTC in terms of how many USD they're worth, so BTC is a unit of account presently. We can say it's because of lack of adoption, but really it's also because the market value of BTC is so volatile.
If I buy a $1000 table today or in 2017, it's roughly a $1000 table. We can't say that a 0.4BTC table was a 0.4BTC table in 2017. We'll expand on this in the next point:
3. Store of Value. When you create economic value, you don't want to be forced to use up the value you created right away.
For instance, if I fix your washing machine and you pay me in avocados, I'd be annoyed. I'd have to consume my payment before it becomes brown, squishy and disgusting. Avocado fruit is not good money because avocadoes loses value very fast.
On the other hand, well-run currencies like the USD, GBP, CAD, EUR, etc. all lose their value at a low and most importantly fairly predictible rate. Let's look at the chart of the USD against BTC
While the dollar loses value at a predictible rate, BTC is all over the place, which is bad.
One important use money is to write loan contracts. Loans are great. They let people spend now against their future potential earnings, so they can buy houses or start businesses without first saving up for a decade. Loans are good for the economy.
If you want to sign something that says "I owe you this much for that much time" then you need to be able to roughly predict the value of the debt in at the point in time where it's due.
Otherwise you'll have a hard time pricing the risk of the loan effectively. This means that you need to charge higher interests. The risk of making a loan in BTC needs to be priced into the interest of a BTC-denominated loan, which means much higher interest rates. High interests on loans are bad, because buying houses and starting businesses are good things.

BTC has a fixed supply, so these problems are built in

Some people think that going back to a standard where our money was denominated by a stock of gold (the Gold Standard) would solve economic problems. This is nonsense.
Having control over supply of your currency is a good thing, as long as it's well run.
See here
Remember that what is desirable is low variance in the value, not the value itself. When there are wild fluctuations in value, it's hard for money to do its job well.
Since the 1970s, the USD has been a fiat money with no intrinsic value. This means we control the supply of money.
Let's look at a classic poorly drawn econ101 graph
The market price for USD is where supply meets demand. The problem with a currency based on an item whose supply is fixed is that the price will necessarily fluctuate in response to changes in demand.
Imagine, if you will, that a pandemic strikes and that the demand for currency takes a sharp drop. The US imports less, people don't buy anything anymore, etc. If you can't print money, you get deflation, which is worsens everything. On the other hand, if you can make the money printers go brrrr you can stabilize the price
Having your currency be based on a fixed supply isn't just bad because in/deflation is hard to control.
It's also a national security risk...
The story of the guy who crashed gold prices in North Africa
In the 1200s, Mansa Munsa, the emperor of the Mali, was rich and a devout Muslim and wanted everyone to know it. So he embarked on a pilgrimage to make it rain all the way to Mecca.
He in fact made it rain so hard he increased the overall supply of gold and unintentionally crashed gold prices in Cairo by 20%, wreaking an economic havoc in North Africa that lasted a decade.
This story is fun, the larger point that having your inflation be at the mercy of foreign nations is an undesirable attribute in any currency. The US likes to call some countries currency manipulators, but this problem would be serious under a gold standard.

Currencies are based on trust

Since the USD is based on nothing except the US government's word, how can we trust USD not to be mismanaged?
The answer is that you can probably trust the fed until political stooges get put in place. Currently, the US's central bank managing the USD, the Federal Reserve (the Fed for friends & family), has administrative authority. The fed can say "no" to dumb requests from the president.
People who have no idea what the fed does like to chant "audit the fed", but the fed is already one of the best audited US federal entities. The transcripts of all their meetings are out in the open. As is their balance sheet, what they plan to do and why. If the US should audit anything it's the Department of Defense which operates without any accounting at all.
It's easy to see when a central bank will go rogue: it's when political yes-men are elected to the board.
For example, before printing themselves into hyperinflation, the Venezuelan president appointed a sociologist who publicly stated “Inflation does not exist in real life” and instead is a made up capitalist lie. Note what happened mere months after his gaining control over the Venezuelan currency
This is a key policy. One paper I really like, Sargent (1984) "The end of 4 big inflations" states:
The essential measures that ended hyperinflation in each of Germany,Austria, Hungary, and Poland were, first, the creation of an independentcentral bank that was legally committed to refuse the government'sdemand or additional unsecured credit and, second, a simultaneousalteration in the fiscal policy regime.
In english: *hyperinflation stops when the central bank can say "no" to the government."
The US Fed, like other well good central banks, is run by a bunch of nerds. When it prints money, even as aggressively as it has it does so for good reasons. You can see why they started printing on March 15th as the COVID lockdowns started:
The Federal Reserve is prepared to use its full range of tools to support the flow of credit to households and businesses and thereby promote its maximum employment and price stability goals.
In english: We're going to keep printing and lowering rates until jobs are back and inflation is under control. If we print until the sun is blotted out, we'll print in the shade.

BTC is not gold

Gold is a good asset for doomsday-preppers. If society crashes, gold will still have value.
How do we know that?
Gold has held value throughout multiple historic catastrophes over thousands of years. It had value before and after the Bronze Age Collapse, the Fall of the Western Roman Empire and Gengis Khan being Gengis Khan.
Even if you erased humanity and started over, the new humans would still find gold to be economically valuable. When Europeans d̶i̶s̶c̶o̶v̶e̶r̶e̶d̶ c̶o̶n̶q̶u̶e̶r̶e̶d̶ g̶e̶n̶o̶c̶i̶d̶e̶d̶ went to America, they found gold to be an important item over there too. This is about equivalent to finding humans on Alpha-Centauri and learning that they think gold is a good store of value as well.
Some people are puzzled at this: we don't even use gold for much! But it has great properties:
First, gold is hard to fake and impossible to manufacture. This makes it good to ascertain payment.
Second, gold doesnt react to oxygen, so it doesn't rust or tarnish. So it keeps value over time unlike most other materials.
Last, gold is pretty. This might sound frivolous, and you may not like it, but jewelry has actual value to humans.
It's no coincidence if you look at a list of the wealthiest families, a large number of them trade in luxury goods.
To paraphrase Veblen humans have a profound desire to signal social status, for the same reason peacocks have unwieldy tails. Gold is a great way to achieve that.
On the other hand, BTC lacks all these attributes. Its value is largely based on common perception of value. There are a few fundamental drivers of demand:
Apart from these, it's hard to argue that BTC will retain value throughout some sort of economic catastrophe.

BTC is really risky

One last statement from Michael Saylor I take offense to is this:
“We feel pretty confident that Bitcoin is less risky than holding cash, less risky than holding gold,” MicroStrategy CEO said in an interview
"BTC is less risky than holding cash or gold long term" is nonsense. We saw before that BTC is more volatile on face value, and that as long as the Fed isn't run by spider monkeys stacked in a trench coat, the inflation is likely to be within reasonable bounds.
But on top of this, BTC has Abrupt downside risks that normal currencies don't. Let's imagine a few:

Blockchain solutions are fundamentally inefficient

Blockchain was a genius idea. I still marvel at the initial white paper which is a great mix of economics and computer science.
That said, blockchain solutions make large tradeoffs in design because they assume almost no trust between parties. This leads to intentionally wasteful designs on a massive scale.
The main problem is that all transactions have to be validated by expensive computational operations and double checked by multiple parties. This means waste:
Many design problems can be mitigated by various improvements over BTC, but it remains that a simple database always works better than a blockchain if you can trust the parties to the transaction.
submitted by VodkaHaze to badeconomics [link] [comments]

The Four Horsemen - Signs of Incoming Crashes, and things.

Hey y'all! I'm going to keep this brief, but I was asked by Mr. October to post this, since I briefly described this on a discord we're both in. I do a ton of market analysis, mostly on alternative data, so I don't have cool superpowers potentially, but I do fancy myself a good trendspotter.
I wanted to share what I call my Four Horseman metric in brief, and I will fill it in more later when I get back/free from the clutches of homework.
The Four Horsemen:
  1. Rapid plunge in BTC/USD - This is an interesting metric, and makes sense if you understand that BTC has evolved from a hedge to a speculation play, which is why it arguably moves in lockstep with SPY most days. However, an interesting property I and many others have noticed is BTC seems to be a leading indicator of market movements, and rapid climbs/plunges tend to signal an incoming correction. See the chart on September 2nd, 2020 for an example.
  2. NOPE_MAD >= 3 End of Day: NOPE, or Net Option Pricing Effect, in principle looks at how dominant options flow trading volume is on the market compared to the more conventional shares volume. When the NOPE_MAD (median absolute deviation) compared to the previous 30 days is 3 deviations higher than normal, this means a red day the next day about 88% of the time (backtested to Mar 2019). You can check NOPE_MAD intraday here - https://thenope.info/nope/default/charts/SPY/2020-10-13 (the URL changes per day, so tomorrow will be 2020-10-14)
  3. The VIX rising with SPY - This usually is part of the parabolic phase, and means a metric fuck ton of calls are being written, which is pushing up option prices across the board. Usually VIX is a measure of downies-volatility, so when it and SPY both go up, it's a Very Bad Thing. Also see September 2nd, 2020.
  4. Small Tech/Caps Leading Big Tech/Caps - This is a more interesting metric, and only makes sense when you understand what causes a Minsky Moment style correction (irrational exuberance). In a stable market, big caps tend to act as a source of strength/safe harbor, and when small caps are leading, this tends to signal intense bull mania, which usually precedes a correction.
Honorable Mentions:
  1. Microsoft going up parabolically - Microsoft is our favorite boomer stock for a reason - it is much more stable than AMZN or AAPL, and doesn't like large movements. I noticed anecdotally this year that right before all the big tech corrections (3-5 days out) MSFT goes up exponentially, often more than the rest of the market, because smart money is looking for safe harbor.
I'd be happy to answer any questions later!

Edit: Wanted to add some stuff given the comments below.
  1. I did not write this to predict a crash based on today's behavior, but to generally inform about a metric I use to detect Minsky Moment style crashes. For more info on that - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minsky_moment
  2. Lots of these indicators are new, and due in large part due to the relative fuckiness of the current market. Bitcoin and SPY did not track until this year, and I only noticed the Microsoft effect I mentioned since about 6/5 onwards. This likely also happens in other boomesafe stocks, but MSFT is by far my largest active trading position, hence why I noticed it.
  3. I will be adding a post soon specifically dedicated to the interpretation of NOPE and NOPE_MAD.
submitted by the_lilypad to thecorporation [link] [comments]

bitcoin price usd l 1 btc to usd l bitcoin price l btc ... 10 Years of Bitcoin - Price History (USD) 2010 - 2020 Bitcoin Cost & Price Bitcoin Today & Bitcoin Money & Bitcoin Value in Dollars & Bitcoin Account History of Bitcoin Price (BTC) 1 Bitcoin price Equals around the world  bitcoin price ...

Get the most accurate Bitcoin (BTC) price using an average from the world's top cryptocurrency exchanges. Live price charts and market data for Bitcoin. 1 Bitcoin Price loading... USD. 24h change: Chart period: Calculator. BTC. USD ... USD [US Dollar] BTC [Bitcoin] 0.01 US Dollar = 0.000001 Bitcoin: 0.1 US Dollar = 0.000008 Bitcoin: 1 US Dollar = 0.000077 Bitcoin: 2 US Dollar = 0.000155 Bitcoin: 3 US Dollar = 0.000232 Bitcoin: 5 US Dollar = 0.000386 Bitcoin: 10 US Dollar = 0.000773 Bitcoin: 20 US Dollar = 0.001546 Bitcoin: 50 US Dollar = 0.003864 Bitcoin: 100 US Dollar = 0 ... 1 BTC = $13001.46. The current price of 1 bitcoin is 13001.46 US Dollars. Bitcoin's value varies by exchanges and traders. To convert US Dollars to bitcoins, on average will cost that much. 1 bitcoin in USD = $13001.46 Bitcoin Price (BTC - USD) 13,040.49-79.05 (-0.60%) 03:05:00 AM. EDT Add to watchlist. TO PORTFOLIO TO WATCHLIST. USD/BTC Buy Bitcoin Now >> Send Money. Don't get overcharged when you send money ... Bitcoin Price (BTC / USD). Price chart, trade volume, market cap, and more. Discover new cryptocurrencies to add to your portfolio. Skip to content. Prices. Products. Company. Earn crypto. Get $171+ Sign in. Get started. Price charts Bitcoin price. Bitcoin price (BTC / USD) View in. USD. Add to Watchlist $ 13,003.21 +0.09%. 1h. 24h. 1w. 1m. 1y. all. $0.0000 January 1 12:00 AM. 4:06 PM 8:16 PM ...

[index] [25760] [44087] [10179] [44077] [2113] [7315] [46965] [22696] [30724] [24718]

bitcoin price usd l 1 btc to usd l bitcoin price l btc ...

Bitcoin smashed USD12,000 and even went above USD13,000! Mattie will take a look at BTC and if it will break USD13,000 or retrace. He'll also talk about what the price might be by year's end as ... 10 Years of Bitcoin Price History from 2010 to 2020. The Price History of Bitcoin and some of my favorite Alt Coins in U.S. Dollars. 10 Years of Cryptocurren... #bitcoinprice#bitcoinrate #Bitcoin_price #bitcoin #bitcoin_eur #bitcoin_usd #cryptocurrency_info #btc #cryptocurrency #crypto_price #bitcoin_price #bitcoin_p... Bitcoin Cost & Price Bitcoin Today & Bitcoin Money & Bitcoin Value in Dollars & Bitcoin Account. bitcoin companies bitcoin conversion rate bitcoin cost bitco... bitcoin price usd l 1 btc to usd l bitcoin price l btc price today bitcoin price, bitcoin price usd, bitcoin value, 1 btc to usd, btc price usd, current bitc...

#